• Home
  • Science 101
    • The Dose
  • Climate Change
  • Natural Resources
  • Wildlife
  • Science News
  • Contact Us
Science Matters CaliforniaScience Matters California
Science Matters CaliforniaScience Matters California
  • Home
  • Science 101
    • The Dose
  • Climate Change
  • Natural Resources
  • Wildlife
  • Science News
  • Contact Us
Roundup of Cancer Evidence “The EPA says the weed killer is safe and non carcinogenic.”

Roundup of Cancer Evidence “The EPA says the weed killer is safe and non carcinogenic.”

May 15, 2019 Natural Resources, Science 101, Wildlife

The EPA has found evidence that weed killer is non carcinogenic. These findings support the growing consensus that safe use of pesticides are not hazardous for humans.

By The Editorial Board, Wall Street Journal

A California jury awarded a stunning $2.055 billion Monday to a couple who claim that Bayer AG’s Roundup weed killer caused their cancer. But would the judgment have been different if the judge had allowed the jury to see contradictory evidence?

That’s the question Bayer will raise in its appeal thanks to Judge Winifred Smith, who presided over the trial. The Alameda County Superior Court judge denied a request by Bayer’s lawyers to inform the jury that the Environmental Protection Agency concluded last month that Roundup’s active ingredient, glyphosate, is noncarcinogenic and poses no risk to public health when used as directed.

The plaintiff lawyers behind these cases rely heavily on the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which claimed glyphosate is “probably carcinogenic.” But the EPA’s new glyphosate assessment is far more robust than that 2015 analysis. Among other considerations, the EPA’s experts looked at 167 epidemiological, animal carcinogenicity, and genotoxicity studies. The agency excluded 39 of those studies over concerns about quality.

The international agency also failed to nix research focused on non-mammalian species like worms or reptiles, which the EPA considered irrelevant in determining human risk. And in 2017 Reuters reported the IARC ignored and omitted evidence that glyphosate was noncarcinogenic.

The EPA also looked for possible hazards to those who ate crops exposed to glyphosate. The agency made conservative assumptions about the levels of glyphosate residue on the crops and drinking water and concluded there is no risk to human health.

That sure sounds relevant, and perhaps the jury would have agreed. Big business isn’t popular these days, but companies don’t deserve to be looted based on a biased presentation of scientific evidence.

Read More at WSJ

Share
1

You also might be interested in

Federal Court Rejects Trump Administration’s Approval of California’s Cadiz Water Pipeline
WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 09: Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump addresses a rally against the Iran nuclear deal on the West Lawn of the U.S. Capitol September 9, 2015 in Washington, DC. Thousands of people gathered for the rally, organized by the Tea Party Patriots, which featured conservative pundits and politicians. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Federal Court Rejects Trump Administration’s Approval of California’s Cadiz Water Pipeline

Jun 24, 2019

President Trump’s  Cadiz water-mining project was blocked by a federal court.[...]

Spotted: A Swarm Of Ladybugs So Huge, It Showed Up On National Weather Service Radar

Spotted: A Swarm Of Ladybugs So Huge, It Showed Up On National Weather Service Radar

Jun 11, 2019

NPR reports weather meteorologist picked up an unexpected blip on[...]

California conservation center to host cheetah fundraiser

California conservation center to host cheetah fundraiser

Oct 21, 2019

The article below discusses the Wild Wonders conservation center’s planned[...]

© 2022 · Science Matters California.

Prev Next